Existed
On the directory
National LCI or contact on record; not yet in LC-MPBI.
Mapping Lean Construction adoption by country
A collaborative benchmarking project where each national Lean Construction institute measures adoption in its country using the same standard method — the German model, adapted locally, compared globally.
Progress board
The ladder
Existed
National LCI or contact on record; not yet in LC-MPBI.
Joined
Country Lead nominated and accepted by the coordinator.
Studied
National assessment run with the shared instrument.
Published
Headline results on the dashboard; full publications in Resources.
About
LC-MPBI is a decentralised yet standardised programme. Every national Lean Construction institute can run its own market-penetration study using a common framework based on the rigorous German model — generating comparable data on visibility, adoption, maturity, and impact while keeping full national ownership.
Germany 2025 is the first published national picture and the reference design other countries adapt.
Institut Teknologi Bandung · Indonesia
United States
KIT & GLCI · Germany
KIT & GLCI · Germany
How to participate
Step 1
Nominate yourself or a team. The coordinator reviews suitability, capacity, and commitment.
Step 2
German-model instrument: maturity stages, 4L4D frame, survey design used in 2025.
Step 3
Start when ready. Timing is voluntary — ownership stays national.
Step 4
Use the shared template so headline figures sit on the same dashboard.
Step 5
Visibility, adoption, maturity, and impact — beside every other country.
Step 6
Take the national picture to IGLC or a national congress.
A Country Lead can be an individual or team from a national LCI, university, research institute, government body, or committed practitioners. Multiple leads per country are welcome.
Resources
The practical package for running a national study with the German model. Read the summary below, then download the working documents when you are ready to start.
Method Guide — how to run Phase 1 (industry scan), Phase 2 (interviews), and Phase 3 (nationwide survey), with room for local adaptation.
Survey Template — core questionnaire. Wording may be adapted; the locked metrics stay the same so results remain comparable.
Interview Guide — themes and example questions for practitioner interviews.
Industry Scan Checklist — sources and steps to identify Lean companies in your country.
Results Template — format for submitting headline figures to the LC-MPBI dashboard.
One-pager — maturity stages and the 4L4D frame for quick reference.
Directory update — for an organisation already on the list, or a new organisation that represents one country or several. The coordinator reviews it; emails stay off the public site.
These stay the same in every national study so numbers can sit on one dashboard:
National questions may be added. Core metrics are not removed or redefined.
Full method, maturity definitions, and questionnaire appendix (John et al., KIT & GLCI).
Phase 3 questionnaire (Q1–Q16). Core metrics locked; wording may be adapted.
Phase 1 search sources and Phase 2 interview themes (v0.9 working draft).
Update an existing organisation, or add one that represents a country or several countries. Reviewed by the coordinator. Emails are not published.
01
Desk research across the market.
451
companies identified in Germany
02
Semi-structured interviews on application and maturity.
15
interviews
03
Every identified company invited.
97
companies · 22% response
Shares: Germany 2025 survey (reference only).
Nominate a Country Lead.
Existing organisations, or a new one that represents one or more countries. Not Country Lead registration.
Wording may change. The metrics stay.
Research report
John et al. · KIT & GLCI
IGLC 33
Weinmann et al. · IGLC33
Benchmark
1 published · 29 existed · 1 survey completed · Last updated 29 August 2026
A regional contact (LCI Latam) is on record; countries are listed individually.
Published · First national benchmark
The reference model other countries adapt. KIT & GLCI.
It works
At Stage 5 every respondent reports positive outcomes.
Not yet standard
451 Lean companies vs 300,000+ firms. 71% still apply Lean in under half of projects.
Two risks
Methods without culture, or Lean as a label, poison the next project.
Contact
Coordinator
Institut Teknologi Bandung · Indonesia